Harry and Meghan furious? Behind the royal family’s facade of unity, heated discussions on Archie and Lilibet

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are said to be furious that their children, Archie and Lilibet, don’t have the same benefits as Prince William and Meghan Markle’s children.

  • Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are furious that their children, Archie and Lilibet, did not obtain the expected titles
  • The Sussex children will receive the title of “prince and princess”
  • Only, Archie and Lilibet will not be able to benefit from the HRH title

The date of September 8 will forever be marked by the death of Queen Elizabeth II at the age of 96. The death of the one who reigned 70 years on the throne of England has nevertheless made it possible to reunite Prince William and prince harry, if only for a walk. Indeed, during the coffin procession of the monarch, the sons of King Charles III were seen walking together behind the coffin made of extremely rare wood with a lead lining. A fake unity behind which would hide even more tensions. In effect, Pure People reports that the Sussexes would be furious that their children, Archie and Lilibet, do not enjoy the same privileges as the children of Prince William and Kate Middleton, new Prince and Princess of Wales.

Between the sons of King Charles III and Lady Di, matters of disagreement do not miss. This information shared by The Sun and relayed by Pure People speaks of an imbalance concerning share of titles between the royal children. Archie, 3, and Lilibet, 1, would not have gotten the “expected titles”. “King Charles III has planned to make his two grandchildren, Archie and Lilibet, prince and princess in the future”, reports the media. The only downside: the two Sussex children will not be able to benefit from the title HRH (His or Her Royal Highness, His Royal Highness). After Prince Harry and Meghan Markle quit royalty, they didn’t no longer entitled to use their royal highness predicates. A consequence that would also impact their children.

A similar case, but the advantages have been acquired

In this case, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are said to have mentioned the case of Prince Andrew’s children. Although the latter no longer had the possibility of using his title of royal highness, his children, Eugenie and Beatrice, nevertheless kept theirs. However, the two princesses “do not directly serve the monarchy”. “Harry and Meghan were worried about safety issues and being prince and princess gives them more secure rights“, told a source at Sun. “There has been a lot of talk since last week. They have been determined on the subject since the death of the queen. They are furious that Archie and Lilibet will not be not considered Royal Highnesses“, always according to the insider.

The agreement would stipulate that the Sussex children can be “prince and princess”but cannot hold the title “HRH”, because they don’t work for the monarchy“. This same rumor explains that Meghan Markle accuses the royal family of favoritism because of the origins of her children. Note that Meghan Markle, 41, is of African American descent. The Sun emphasizes that this agreement was enacted by King George V, in 1917. Its objective being to limit the holders of the HRH title.

Harry and Meghan furious? Behind the royal family’s facade of unity, heated discussions on Archie and Lilibet