The Canciellos & the Casalesi Clan. The father

Some of our evaluations on the definition that the prosecutors give of the monopolistic family of the ASI

AVERSA/CASAL DI PRINCIPE – (GG) Yesterday (CLICK AND READ THE ARTICLE) we illustrated the story of the extortions perpetrated by the new group of the Casalesi clan, rebuilt around the figures ofthe Giovanni Della Corte and, albeit to a lesser extent, on that of Franco Biancoto the detriment of the Canciello family, which we certainly don’t have to present to the readers of CasertaCe who have been reading its controversial deeds for years.

When we talk about the Canciello family, we are referring to the names that are formulated in the two provisional charges, both the one we wrote about yesterday and the one we wrote about this morning. Preliminary investigation judge Isabella Iaselli, a magistrate with very long and vast experience in the evaluation sector of requests for the application of precautionary measures made by the District Anti-Mafia Directorate of Naples, in practice absorbs the definition that the Dda itself provides, as an identifying feature, of the brothers Ferdinando, Michele, Carlo and Carmine Cancielloshareholders and in any case de facto managers (sic!) of Marican holding spa, a company operating in the industrial building sector”.

Indeed the definition is in our opinion 70% appropriate. But on the other hand, the investigating magistrates of the DDA could not write more than this. Because it is true that Ferdinando, Michele Carlo and Carmine Canciello are the owners or, at least for some of them, the de facto managers, we repeat, in fact – as the DDA writes – of Marican Holding spa, that is the family company here described several times in all of its internal structures and from which hundreds, yes, hundreds have sprouted – we have been writing this for years and this is considered a normal fact in these parts – of other companies marked with the Marican brand or with the Vega and with still others.

This is certainly not the context within which to reiterate the perplexities. the doubts raised by us and repaid by the strange judicial strategy of the Canciellos, who first sue us in civil proceedings asking for compensation of 4 million euros and then, after reading our constitution, practically written in my hand, ask for an overcoming, a settlement agreement, based on a series of articles that we had no difficulty in signing, simply because this journal has never written an article on the Canciellos that wasn’t based on documents, cited and published in the margins of the same. This is not the place, also because we have written our point of view on the reason for the 70, 80, 100 and more companies all called Marican or all Vega, etc., and we are still waiting for the leader of the family, i.e. Ferdinando Canciello can compare his opinion, his explanation in order to demolish ours.

That said, the Dda defines Marican holding spa as “company operating in the industrial construction sector“. Obviously this is a definition of a school which takes note of a situation which is thus presented in the chamber of commerce certificates and in Marican’s corporate object. On the other hand, we believe, always available to Canciello should he wish to refute our thesis, that the activity of this company integrates the typical modalities of the real estate building company, i.e. that of someone who builds exclusively to sell or rent what he builds, with the anomaly that all this takes place in the perimeter that delimits the industrial development areas of the province of Caserta and of the Agro Agro in particular, where, on paper, but only on paper, because the governance of Asi who, not by chance, spent more than 60,000 euros of public money to leash lawyers, especially Romans, on my and our heels, interprets those of the Canciello family as industrial settlements, not pushing the analysis of the mechanisms that lead Marican to build sheds which, by law, and due to the regulatory constraints of the ASI of Caserta, could not change ownership for a good 9 years and which instead in fact change it even if formally they do not change it, because then we wrote dozens of times, what are the 70, 80, 90, 100 companies registered by Marican and Vega, whose signs not by chance stand out on almost all the warehouses of the industrial area of ​​north Aversa, enclosed above all in territories in the municipalities of Carinaro , Teverola and Gricignano? This is why we are in 70% agreement with the definition that the Dda declines for Marican holding spa.

Going back to dealing with the ordinance, the contestation of the crime of aggravated extortion (article 629 paragraphs 1 and 2 linked precisely in the conformation of aggravation to article 628 paragraph 3 number 3) concerns this time the Giugliano side which, mind you, in this ordinance it is an antagonistic side, a competitor with respect to the organization set up by Giovanni Della Corte and Franco Bianco. Far from it: the Dda repeatedly writes that the Giuglianese belong to the Schiavone wing, led until his death by Salvatore Sestile, incredible but true, owner of one of the best-known restaurants for ceremonies in Campania, also frequented by many VIPs, by Cardinal Sepe, we are talking about La Contessa.

Please, the fact that Salvatore Sestile was the father-in-law of Antonio Schiavone, brother of Francesco Schiavone Sandokan and Walter Schiavone Scarface, does not enter into the judicial evaluation of the elements, operated by the Dda. Having said this, however, the anti-mafia magistrates consider the group of Salvatore Sestile and Giuseppe Granata di Giugliano, “close to the Schiavone family“, in exactly the same way they consider the new group, founded by Della Corte known as “cucchione” and Franco Bianco known as “Musullin”.

And then the charge of crime formulated against Joseph Granata, it is in practice specular, a real photocopy of the one formulated yesterday against Della Corte and his loyalist Salvatore DeFalco. Salvatore Sestile, patron of La Contessa, had escaped arrest a few years ago because another investigating judge of the Naples court did not consider the elements sufficient to constitute those serious indications of guilt against him when the Carabinieri of Caserta worked hard on all that what was happening inside La Contessa, which hosted VIPs and cardinals in one hall and other Camorra summit rooms.

This time, he would not have escaped and if he did not go to prison it is only because he died as it is easy to deduce from the technical formulation of chapter 3. The Canciellos were asked to periodically pay sums of money of at least 10 thousand euros, precisely the same figure that appears in the indictment against De Falco and Della Corte. In this case, the mediator chosen by the Canciellos Biagio Francescone he is not investigated as in chapter 3 given that this happens because at a certain point, Francescone, rather than defending Canciello’s interests, passes bag and baggage with Giovanni Della Corte who has gone to share the extortion charge with him.

But Biagio Francescone is however also present in chapter 4 since the extortion activity of the group of Salvatore Sestile with armed wing Giuseppe Granata, more dated than that set up by Della Corte, was managed by the entrepreneurial family of Frattamaggiore, transplanted to Aversa again through the work of this Francescone, evidently a specialist in mediation with the Camorra.

As we also wrote yesterday, the Carabinieri and DDA magistrates asked the Canciellos to account for these episodes who, however, despite the fact that the investigators had in their hands irrefutable evidence proving the extortion activity of the Casalesi, opposed a wall of rubber so integral as to convince the Anti-Mafia prosecutors to do something we have rarely seen them do: investigate what is part of an investigation as an offense, for aiding and abetting the Casalesi clan.


The Canciellos & the Casalesi Clan. The father-in-law of Sandokan’s brother also asks for protection money from the emperors of the Asi of CASERTA – CasertaCE